NERSC logo National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  A DOE Office of Science User Facility
  at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Restore navigation column
NERSC User Survey Results - 2002


FY 2002 User Survey Results

Many thanks to the 300 users who responded to this year's User Survey -- this represents the highest response level in the five years we have conducted the survey. The respondents represent all five DOE Science Offices and a variety of home institutions: see User Information.

You can see the FY 2002 User Survey text, in which users rated us on a 7-point satisfaction scale. Some areas were also rated on a 3-point importance scale.

Satisfaction ScoreMeaning
7Very Satisfied
6Mostly Satisfied
5Somewhat Satisfied
4Neutral
3Somewhat Dissatisfied
2Mostly Dissatisfied
1Very Dissatisfied
Importance ScoreMeaning
3Very Important
2Somewhat Important
1Not Important

The survey responses provide feedback about every aspect of NERSC's operation, help us judge the quality of our services, give DOE information on how well NERSC is doing, and point us to areas we can improve. The survey results are listed below.

Every year we institute changes based on the survey; this past year's efforts include:

  1. With the NERSC User Group we established a queue committee whose task was to investigate queue issues and recommend improvements. This year's rating for SP: queue structure went up by 0.7 points. Based on the committee's recommendations NERSC did the following:
    • Improved debug and interactive turnaround during prime time by setting aside 5% of the SP compute pool for interactive and debug jobs from 5:00 AM to 6:00 PM Pacific Time Monday to Friday. This year's rating for SP: ability to run interactively went up by 0.8 points.
    • Implemented priority aging for regular class jobs: jobs in the regular class for more than 36 hours will not be preempted by new premium jobs.
    • Provided a new regular_long class with a connect time limit of 24 hours for jobs using 32 nodes or less. Such jobs are not drained for system outages so self-checkpointing is very important for regular_long jobs.
    The NUG queue committee recommended to NOT implement serial queues on Seaborg.

  2. NERSC provided more performance analysis tools on the SP along with documentation and training on how to use them. See Programming Tools. This year's rating for SP: performance and debugging tools went up by .8 points.

  3. NERSC installed new visualization tools on the Vis Server, Escher, as well as on Seabog, and streamlined visualization documentation. See Visualization Packages. This year's rating for Visualization Services went up by .3 points.

  4. NERSC wrote a number of scripts to improve SP management procedures. This year's rating for SP: uptime went up by 1 point, the largest increase in satisfaction of the whole survey.

  5. NERSC started to conduct monthly training sessions on the internet using Access Grid Node technology. This technology is still not completely mature and there have been a few rough spots along the way. Satisfaction with training remains at the same level as last year and we will work to improve our training program in the upcoming year.
The average satisfaction scores from this year's survey ranged from a high of 6.6 to a low of 4.8. Areas with the highest user satisfaction were:
  1. SP: uptime
  2. Consulting: timely response
  3. HPSS: reliability
  4. PDSF: uptime
Areas with the lowest user satisfaction were:
  1. PVP: batch wait time
  2. Visualization services
  3. Training
The largest increases in satisfaction came from the SP: 9 of the 18 ratings that were significantly higher this year than last year were SP ratings. Other areas showing significant improvements were the T3E (queue structure, tools and utilities, uptime), visualization services, hardware and software configuration, and the New Users Guide.

Only two areas were rated significantly lower this year: PVP performance and debugging tools, and the allocations process.

92 users answered the question What does NERSC do well?   71 respondents pointed out that NERSC is a well run center with good hardware. 42 singled out User Support and NERSC's staff, 16 NERSC's documentation and 13 job scheduling and batch throughput. Some representative comments are:

    Among the supercomputing facilities I tried until now, NERSC excells in most aspects. I am most satisfied with the overall stability of the system. This must come from the outstanding competence of the technicians.

    I really appreciate the job fron consult. They always did their best to help me to resolve my technique problems, especially at starting to use seaborg.

    NERSC provides access to very high performance computing facilities on a platform with a simple interface, making development easy. Information services, training, account management, and consulting are all excellent.

    The available hardware and software is very good. It meets my needs well. There is an abundance of documentation I have benefited from. Account support has also been very good. I also appreciate the seeming concern about security.

66 users responded to What should NERSC do differently? The following issues were raised and will be addressed in the upcoming year:

  • SP scheduling:
    • Could more resources be devoted to the regular_long class (more nodes, a longer run time, better throughput)?
    • Could longer run time limits be implemented across the board?
    • Could more services be devoted to interactive jobs?
    • Could there be a serial queue?
  • SP software:
    • Could the Unix environment be more user-friendly (e.g. more editors and shells in the default path)?
    • Could there be more data analysis software, including matlab?
  • Computing resources:
    • NERSC needs more computational power overall
    • Could a PVP resource be provided?
    • Could mid-range computing or cluster resources be provided?
  • Documentation:
    • Provide better searching, navigation, organization of the information.
    • Enhance SP documentation.
  • Training:
    • Provide more training on performance analysis, optimization and debugging.
    • Provide more information in the New Users Guide.

Here are the survey results:

  1. User Information
  2. Overall Satisfaction and Importance
  3. All Satisfaction Questions and Changes from Previous Years
  4. Visualization and Grid Computing
  5. Web, NIM, and Communications
  6. Hardware Resources
  7. Software Resources
  8. Training
  9. User Services
  10. Comments about NERSC


1. User Information


Number of respondents to the survey: 300


Respondents by DOE Office and User Role:

Office Number Percent
ASCR22 7
BER43 14
BES65 22
FES55 18
HENP112 37
guests3 1
User Role Number Percent
Principal Investigators 48 16
PI Proxies 34 11
Project Managers 10 3
Users 208 69


Respondents by Organization:

Organization Type Number Percent
Universities 169 56
DOE Labs 107 36
Industry 9 3
Other Govt Labs 10 3
Private Labs 5 2
Organization Number Percent
Berkeley Lab4214
UC Berkeley176
Argonne124
Livermore103
PPPL93
Oak Ridge83
U Wisconsin72
UC Santa Cruz72
Brookhaven62
PNNL62
U. Maryland62
NCAR52
Ohio State52
SLAC52
U Colorado52
Auburn U41
Iowa State41
Los Alamos41
Max Planck Inst. Astro.41
Northwestern U.41
U Texas41
U Washington41
UC Davis41
UCLA41
Organization Number
Ames Lab3
General Atomics3
NREL3
U Georgia3
U Michigan3
U Minnesota3
U Utah3
UC San Diego3
Vanderbilt3
Yale3
Harvard2
Inst. Nat. de Physique2
Inst. Nat. di Fisica Nucleare2
JGI2
MIT2
N.C. State2
New Mexico St.2
New York Univ2
Omega-P2
Purdue2
Stanford2
SUNY Stony Brook2
U. Illinois2
U. South Carolina2
UC Irvine2
UC Santa Barbara2
Wayne State U.2
Other University44
Other Gov. Labs4
Other Industry3
Private Labs1
Other DOE Labs1


Which NERSC resources do you use?

Note that users did not always check all the resources they use -- compare the table below with How Satisfied are you? (sorted by Number of Responses).

Resource No. of
Responses
SP210
HPSS118
T3E92
NIM88
Consulting80
HPCF Website66
Account Support55
PVP53
PDSF49
Computer Operations and Network Support18
Alvarez11
Escher8
Newton8


How long have you used NERSC?

TimeNumber Percent
less than 6 months 53 18
6 months - 3 years 135 46
more than 3 years 104 36


What desktop systems do you use to connect to NERSC?

Operating System TypeNumber
Unix350
PC138
MAC66
Other   3
Individual SystemsNumber
UNIX-linux189
PC-win200074
UNIX-solaris72
PC-winXP39
MAC-OSX36
MAC-macos30
UNIX-irix25
PC-win9821
UNIX-aix20
UNIX-hpux20
Individual SystemsNumber
UNIX-tru6414
UNIX-other12
PC-win953
OSF12
PC-windows3.01
PC-OS/21
Digital Alpha2
Open VMS1
PalmOS1
Digital UNIX1
NCD X terminal1
FreeBSD1
Alpha DS101
Putty1
Ultrix1


Web Browser Used to Take Survey:

BrowserNumberPercentChange in Percent from '01Annual Growth Rate
Netscape 412942.7-28.1-40%
MSIE 64615.2+13.1+624%
MSIE 54615.2-3.4-18%
Mozilla3511.6+7.4+176%
Netscape 625 8.3+6.6+388%
Konqueror8 2.6+1.8+225%
Galeon6 2.0 +2.0 
MSIE 420.7-0.1-12%
Netscape 72 0.7   
OmniWeb2 0.7   
Netscape 31 0.3   

All Netscape 3-413043.0-28.2-40%
All MSIE9431.1+9.6+45%
All Mozilla-based6822.6+16.7+383%
All Other103.3+2.1+175%


Operating System Used to Take Survey:

OSNumberPercent
Linux9531.5
Windows NT8829.1
MacIntosh4113.6
SunOS3110.3
Windows 98227.3
DEC OSF124.0
SGI IRIX62.0
HP-UX20.7
IBM AIX20.7
Unknown X1110.3
OS/210.3
Windows 9510.3

All UNIX14949.3
All Windows11136.8
All MacIntosh4113.6


2. Overall Satisfaction and Importance


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Somewhat Satisfied4.5 - 5.4
ImportanceAverage Score
Very Important2.5 - 3
Somewhat Important1.5 - 2.4
Significance of Change
significant increase
significant decrease
not significant


Overall Satisfaction with NERSC:

Topic  No. of Responses Average Score Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Account Support Services2406.380.95-0.05
Overall satisfaction with NERSC2856.320.930.07
Consulting Services2296.301.03-0.00
SW maintenance and configuration2026.171.030.25
HW management and configuration2106.101.040.28
HPCF Website2246.090.85-0.09
Network Connectivity2306.071.150.04
Mass Storage Facilities2056.041.11-0.01
Available software2435.981.020.17
Available Computing Hardware2425.971.20-0.14
Allocation Process1945.841.16-0.16
Training1034.991.230.07
Visualization Services944.831.240.32


Importance to Users:

Topic  No. of Responses Average Score Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Available Computing Hardware2282.890.360.08
Overall satisfaction with NERSC2612.840.370.02
Network Connectivity2142.750.48-0.07
HW management and configuration1982.710.530.09
Consulting Services2222.580.63-0.06
Allocation Process1852.570.65-0.10
SW maintenance and configuration1872.540.58-0.06
Available software2202.530.56-0.03
HPCF Website2152.520.630.03
Mass Storage Facilities1912.510.670.03
Account Support Services2192.470.620.03
Training1181.750.76-0.05
Visualization Services1121.620.74-0.09


3. All Satisfaction Questions and Changes from Previous Years


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Very Satisfied6.5 - 7
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Somewhat Satisfied4.5 - 5.4

How Satisfied are you? (sorted by Average Score)

Topics from the Overall Satisfaction with NERSC section are indicated in bold; they tend to be answered by more users and rated lower than the topics in the ensuing sections that rate specific areas in more detail.

TopicNo. of Responses Average Score
SP: Uptime1766.56
Consulting: Timely Response2076.51
HPSS: Reliability1276.51
PDSF: Uptime416.51
T3E: Uptime626.48
Consulting: Techical Advice2056.47
PVP: Fortran Compilers346.47
PDSF: C/C++ Compilers356.46
PDSF: Fortran Compilers226.45
T3E: Fortran Compilers496.45
Consulting: Time to Solve Problems1986.40
Consulting: Response to Special Requests1366.40
Consulting: Followup1886.39
Account Support Services2406.38
HPSS: Overall1426.39
PDSF: User Environment396.38
SP: Overall1876.38
HPSS: Uptime1256.37
SP: Fortran Compilers1256.37
HPSS: Performance1266.35
Overall Satisfaction with NERSC2856.32
PVP: Uptime396.31
Consulting Services 2296.30
PDSF: Overall466.26
Web: Accuracy2026.25
PDSF: Software Libraries296.24
T3E: User Environment546.24
Training: New User's Guide1386.21
PDSF: Applications296.21
Web: Timeliness1816.20
PDSF: Running Interactively396.18
Software Maintenance & Configuration2026.17
Web: Running Jobs1986.15
PVP: User Environment346.15
T3E: Software Libraries396.13
SP: User Environment1656.12
T3E: Overall726.11
SP: C/C++ Compilers766.11
Hardware Management & Configuration2106.10
HPCF Website2246.09
SP: Software Libraries1196.09
Network Connectivity2306.07
PVP: Overall476.06
Mass Storage Facilities2056.04
T3E: C/C++ Compilers256.04
PDSF: Tools & Utilities286.04
PDSF: SW Bug Resolution246.00
NIM Interface916.00
PVP: I/O276.00
Available Software2435.98
Training: Online Tutorials1085.97
Available Computing Hardware2425.97
T3E: Tools & Utilities355.97
PDSF: Queue Structure395.97
SP: I/O1435.97
Web: SP Pages1815.96
Web: Software Pages1685.96
HPSS: User Interface1305.95
Consulting: Online Web Interface1095.94
PVP: C/C++ Compilers145.93
SP: Queue Structure1655.92
Web: T3E Pages845.89
Training: Web Pages995.89
Web: Programming Info1785.85
T3E: SW Bug Resolution265.85
Web: File Storage Pages1145.84
Allocations Process1945.84
T3E: SW Applications315.84
PVP: Ability to Run Interactively335.82
Web: PDSF375.81
Web: Finding Info2295.80
SP: Tools & Utilities1135.80
T3E: Perf. & Debugging Tools325.78
T3E: Queue Structure565.76
SP: SW Applications905.70
PVP: Queue Structure365.69
T3E: I/O475.68
Web: Searching1755.66
PDSF: I/O385.63
PVP: SW Libraries285.61
PVP: SW Bug Resolution155.60
SP: SW Bug Resolution785.59
PVP: Tools & Utilities215.57
Web: PVP Pages555.55
SP: Perf. & Debug Tools1125.49
SP: Ability to Run Interactively1505.47
PVP: SW Applications165.44
Viz Server: Escher95.44
SP: Batch Wait Time1755.41
Math Server: Newton 85.38
PVP: Perf. & Debug Tools185.33
Training: Slides from Classes605.33
PDSF: Perf. & Debug Tools285.25
T3E: Batch Wait Time615.23
Training: Classes405.12
Training: Overall1034.99
Visualization Services944.83
PVP: Batch Wait Time354.77

How Satisfied are you? (sorted by Number of Responses)

This ordering helps to indicate which services are used most by users (and is probably a better indicator than the services clicked for the question What NERSC resources do you use?

TopicNo. of Responses Average Score
Overall Satisfaction with NERSC2856.32
Available Software2435.98
Account Support Services2406.38
Available Computing Hardware2425.97
Network Connectivity2306.07
Consulting Services 2296.30
Web: Finding Info2295.80
HPCF Website2246.09
Hardware Management & Configuration2106.10
Consulting: Timely Response2076.51
Consulting: Techical Advice2056.47
Mass Storage Facilities2056.04
Web: Accuracy2026.25
Software Maintenance & Configuration2026.17
Consulting: Time to Solve Problems1986.40
Web: Running Jobs1986.15
Allocations Process1945.84
Consulting: Followup1886.39
SP: Overall1876.38
Web: Timeliness1816.20
Web: SP Pages1815.96
Web: Programming Info1785.85
SP: Uptime1766.56
Web: Searching1755.66
SP: Batch Wait Time1755.41
Web: Software Pages1685.96
SP: User Environment1656.12
SP: Queue Structure1655.92
SP: Ability to Run Interactively1505.47
SP: I/O1435.97
HPSS: Overall1426.39
Training: New User's Guide1386.21
Consulting: Response to Special Requests1366.40
HPSS: User Interface1305.95
HPSS: Reliability1276.51
HPSS: Performance1266.35
HPSS: Uptime1256.37
SP: Fortran Compilers1256.37
SP: Software Libraries1196.09
Web: File Storage Pages1145.84
SP: Tools & Utilities1135.80
SP: Perf. & Debug Tools1125.49
Consulting: Online Web Interface1095.94
Training: Online Tutorials1085.97
Training: Overall1034.99
Training: Web Pages995.89
Visualization Services944.83
NIM Interface916.00
SP: SW Applications905.70
Web: T3E Pages845.89
SP: SW Bug Resolution785.59
SP: C/C++ Compilers766.11
T3E: Overall726.11
T3E: Uptime626.48
T3E: Batch Wait Time615.23
Training: Slides from Classes605.33
T3E: Queue Structure565.76
Web: PVP Pages555.55
T3E: User Environment546.24
T3E: Fortran Compilers496.45
PVP: Overall476.06
T3E: I/O475.68
PDSF: Overall466.26
PDSF: Uptime416.51
Training: Classes405.12
PDSF: User Environment396.38
PVP: Uptime396.31
PDSF: Running Interactively396.18
T3E: Software Libraries396.13
PDSF: Queue Structure395.97
PDSF: I/O385.63
Web: PDSF375.81
PVP: Queue Structure365.69
PDSF: C/C++ Compilers356.46
T3E: Tools & Utilities355.97
PVP: Batch Wait Time354.77
PVP: Fortran Compilers346.47
PVP: User Environment346.15
PVP: Ability to Run Interactively335.82
T3E: Perf. & Debugging Tools325.78
T3E: SW Applications315.84
PDSF: Software Libraries296.24
PDSF: Applications296.21
PDSF: Tools & Utilities286.04
PVP: SW Libraries285.61
PDSF: Perf. & Debug Tools285.25
PVP: I/O276.00
T3E: SW Bug Resolution265.85
T3E: C/C++ Compilers256.04
PDSF: SW Bug Resolution246.00
PDSF: Fortran Compilers226.45
PVP: Tools & Utilities215.57
PVP: Perf. & Debug Tools185.33
PVP: SW Applications165.44
PVP: SW Bug Resolution155.60
PVP: C/C++ Compilers145.93
Viz Server: Escher95.44
Math Server: Newton 85.38



2001 to 2002 Changes:

The following are statistically significant changes for responses to questions common to the 2001 and 2002 user surveys.

Topic 2002 Score 2001 Score Change
SP: Uptime 6.565.53+1.03
SP: Perf. & Debugging Tools 5.494.69+0.80
SP: Ability to Run Interactively 5.474.71+0.76
SP: Queue Structure 5.925.19+0.73
SP: Overall 6.385.82+0.56
SP: Batch Wait Time 5.414.92+0.49
SP: Fortran Compilers 6.365.96+0.40
T3E: Queue Structure 5.765.36+0.40
SP: C/C++ Compilers 6.115.72+0.39
T3E: Tools & Utilities 5.975.65+0.32
Visualization Services 4.834.51+0.32
SP: I/O 5.975.67+0.30
Hardware Maintenance & Config. 6.105.82+0.28
Training: New User's Guide 6.215.94+0.27
T3E: Uptime 6.486.22+0.26
Software Maintenance & Config. 6.175.92+0.25
Web: SP Pages 5.965.78+0.18
Available Software 5.985.81+0.17
Allocations Process 5.846.00-0.16
PVP: Perf. & Debugging Tools 5.336.06-0.73


1999 to 2002 Changes:

The following are statistically significant changes for responses to questions common to the 1999 and 2002 user surveys (1999 was prior to the SP's arrival at NERSC).

Topic 2002 Score 1999 Score Change
PVP: Overall 6.065.05+1.01
PVP: Batch Wait Times 4.773.95+0.82
PVP: Queue Structure 5.695.03+0.66
PVP: Ability to Run Interactively 5.825.18+0.64
Visualization Services 4.834.37+0.46
HPSS: Performance 6.355.90+0.45
T3E: I/O 5.685.23+0.45
PVP: I/O 6.005.56+0.44
PVP: Fortran Compilers 6.476.04+0.43
Hardware Maintenance & Config. 6.105.71+0.39
T3E: Queue Structure 5.765.47+0.29
Software Maintenance & Config. 6.175.89+0.28
HPSS: Overall 6.396.12+0.27
T3E: Fortran Compilers 6.456.20+0.25
HPCF Website 6.095.87+0.22
T3E: Uptime 6.486.26+0.22
Web: Timeliness of Info 6.205.99+0.21
Consulting: Timely Response 6.516.64-0.13
Consulting: Overall 6.306.58-0.28
Training: Slides from Classes 5.335.95-0.62
PVP: Software Libraries 5.616.40-0.81
Training: Classes 5.126.19-1.07


4. Visualization and Grid Computing


Are you a current user of visualization services at NERSC?

Answer No. of Responses
No238
Yes10

If not, what are your reasons for not using visualization services at NERSC?

Reason No. of Responses
I don't need visualization for my project127
Don't know about services or can't find information87
Network is too slow35
Other32
Software not applicable to my domain or software doesn't do what I want it to do10

Other reasons given for not using NERSC visualization services:   40 responses

27   I do visualization at my local institution / remote user
7   Project isn't yet ready to do visualizations
3   Network is too slow
3   I don't know what is available at NERSC
2   Software not available at NERSC
2   NERSC software is too hard to us
2   I don't do visualizations

On which of the following platforms do you prefer to use viz tools?

Platform No. of Responses
Your desktop88
Seaborg50
Newton10
Escher9
Other4

Do you plan to use any Grid applications this year? Which ones?   55 responses

Use Grid?  No. of Responses
No36
Maybe11
Yes8

7   Globus Toolkit
7   Data services
4   Processor / queuing services
4   General interest in the Grid
2   Network support and open ports

What services, features, or functionality would you like to see available on the DOE Science Grid?   16 responses

4   Data services
4   Processor / queuing services
4   Network support
2   Globus Toolkit
1   Ease of use


5. Web and Communications


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
ImportanceAverage Score
Somewhat Important1.5 - 2.4
Significance of Change
significant increase
significant decrease
not significant

Satisfaction with the Web:

Topic  No. of ResponsesAverage ScoreStd. Dev.Change from 2001
Accuracy2026.250.900.10
Timeliness of info1816.200.900.12
Running Jobs Section1986.150.98 
NIM916.001.10 
SP Pages1815.961.180.18
Software Section1685.960.94 
T3E Pages845.891.08-0.01
General programming info1785.851.080.13
File Storage Pages1145.841.110.05
PDSF375.811.10 
Ease of finding info on web2295.800.99-0.08
Search facilities1755.661.100.11
PVP Pages555.551.15-0.09


How useful are these methods for keeping you informed?

Method No. of Responses Average Score Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Email2012.460.680.02
Announcement web archive1832.340.750.29
MOTD1852.090.82-0.18
Phone calls1471.680.87-0.13


Are you well informed of changes?

Question No. of Yes Responses No. of No Responses Percent Who Said Yes Percent Who Said Yes in 2001
Do you feel you are adequately informed? 2229 96 94
Are you aware of major changes at least 1 month in advance? 184 18 91 81
Are you aware of software changes at least 7 days in advance? 163 27 86 81
Are you aware of planned outages 24 hours in advance? 176 26 87 91


Summary of Information Technology Comments

Comments concerning the HPCF web site:   22 responses

8   Good website
6   Provide additional or clearer information
5   Improve searching
3   Problems navigating / better organization
3   Remove outdated info / correct erros

Comments concerning the PDSF web site:   6 responses

4   Provide additional or clearer information
2   Good website

Comments concerning NIM:   20 responses

8   Issues with ERCAP or the allocations process
8   Good interface
3   Problems with reliability
1   Difficult to use
1   Violates privacy

Comments concerning how NERSC keeps you informed of changes:   13 responses

6   Satisfied / well informed
2   Comments on using email
2   Comments on the MOTD
2   Comments on system outages
1   Violates privacy


6. Hardware Resources


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Very Satisfied6.5 - 7
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Somewhat Satisfied4.5 - 5.4
Significance of Change
significant increase
significant decrease
not significant


Satisfaction - Compute Platforms (sorted by Average Score):

Topic No. of ResponsesAverage Score Std. Dev.Change from 2001
SP Uptime1766.560.811.03
PDSF Uptime416.510.78 
T3E Uptime626.480.840.26
SP Overall1876.380.870.56
PVP Uptime396.310.89-0.14
PDSF Overall466.260.93 
PDSF Ability to Run Interactively396.180.97 
T3E Overall726.111.03-0.12
PVP Overall476.060.94-0.08
PVP Disk Configuration and I/O Performance276.001.110.00
PDSF Queue Structure395.971.14 
SP Disk Configuration and I/O Performance1435.971.250.30
SP Queue Structure1655.921.070.73
PVP Ability to Run Interactively335.821.26-0.16
T3E Queue Structure555.761.090.40
PDSF Batch Wait Time395.741.21 
T3E Ability to Run Interactively565.731.370.09
PVP Queue Structure365.691.090.28
T3E Disk Configuration and I/O Performance475.681.120.08
PDSF Disk Configuration and I/O Performance385.631.30 
SP Ability to Run Interactively1505.471.580.76
SP Batch Wait Time1755.411.470.49
T3E Batch Wait Time615.231.520.26
PVP Batch Wait Time354.771.440.21


Satisfaction - Compute Platforms (sorted by Platform):

Topic No. of ResponsesAverage Score Std. Dev.Change from 2001
SP Uptime1766.560.811.03
SP Overall1876.380.870.56
SP Disk Configuration and I/O Performance1435.971.250.30
SP Queue Structure1655.921.070.73
SP Ability to Run Interactively1505.471.580.76
SP Batch Wait Time1755.411.470.49
PDSF Uptime416.510.78 
PDSF Overall466.260.93 
PDSF Ability to Run Interactively396.180.97 
PDSF Queue Structure395.971.14 
PDSF Batch Wait Time395.741.21 
PDSF Disk Configuration and I/O Performance385.631.30 
T3E Uptime626.480.840.26
T3E Overall726.111.03-0.12
T3E Queue Structure555.761.090.40
T3E Ability to Run Interactively565.731.370.09
T3E Disk Configuration and I/O Performance475.681.120.08
T3E Batch Wait Time615.231.520.26
PVP Uptime396.310.89-0.14
PVP Overall476.060.94-0.08
PVP Disk Configuration and I/O Performance276.001.110.00
PVP Ability to Run Interactively335.821.26-0.16
PVP Queue Structure365.691.090.28
PVP Batch Wait Time354.771.440.21


Max Processors Used and Max Code Can Effectively Use:

Topic No. of Responses Average Std. Dev.Change from 2001
SP Processors Can Use115546.25948.16-204.75
T3E Processors Can Use36520.001179.09164.00
Max SP Processors Used151171.38272.76-30.62
Max T3E Processors Used48149.35160.0816.35
PDSF Processors Can Use2297.50241.58 
Max PDSF Processors Used2235.1481.22 
PVP Processors Can Use196.957.90-23.05
Max PVP Processors Used225.455.18-4.55


Satisfaction - HPSS:

Topic No. of Responses Average Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Reliability1276.510.94-0.12
HPSS Overall1426.390.91-0.11
Uptime1256.371.040.04
Performance1266.351.06-0.01
User Interface1305.951.30-0.07


Satisfaction - Servers:

Server No. of Responses Average Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Escher (viz)95.441.130.36
Newton (math)85.381.30-0.09


Summary of Hardware Comments

Comments on NERSC's IBM SP: 54 responses

21   Good machine
15   Queue issues
9   Needs more resources / too slow
7   Provide more interactive services
6   Hard to use / would like additional features
2   Stability issues
2   Disk issues
1   Need cluster computing at NERSC

Comments on NERSC's Cray T3E:   18 responses

11   Good machine / sorry to see it go
2   Mixed evaluation
2   Provide better interactive services
1   Queue issues

Comments on NERSC's Cray PVP Cluster:   14 responses

11   Good machine / sorry to see it go / need PVP resource
2   Improve batch turnaround time

Comments on NERSC's PDSF Cluster:   9 responses

4   Good system
2   Queue and priority issues
2   Disk issues
1   Would like new functionality
1   Needs more resources

Comments on NERSC's HPSS Storage System:   31 responses

16   Good system
6   Don't like the down times / downs need to be handled more gracefully
4   Performance improvements needed
4   Would like new functionality
1   Hard to use
1   Authentication issues

Comments about NERSC's auxiliary servers:   3 responses



6. Software


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Somewhat Satisfied4.5 - 5.4
 Significance of Change
significant increase
significant decrease
not significant

Satisfaction with Software (sorted by Average Score):

Software Category No. of ResponsesAverage Score  Std. Dev.Change from 2001
PVP Fortran Compilers346.470.71-0.19
PDSF C/C++ Compilers356.460.70 
PDSF Fortran Compilers226.450.74 
T3E Fortran Compilers496.450.840.05
PDSF User Environment396.380.78 
SP Fortran Compilers1416.361.100.40
PDSF Libraries296.240.95 
T3E User Environment546.240.870.06
PDSF Applications296.210.98 
PVP User Environment346.150.78-0.10
T3E Libraries396.130.92-0.05
SP User Environment1656.121.130.05
SP C/C++ Compilers766.111.090.39
SP Libraries1196.091.030.09
T3E C/C++ Compilers256.041.100.11
PDSF General Tools and Utilities286.041.04 
PDSF Bug Resolution246.001.14 
T3E General Tools and Utilities355.970.860.32
PVP C/C++ Compilers145.931.21-0.07
T3E Bug Resolution265.851.080.15
T3E Applications315.841.040.06
SP General Tools and Utilities1135.801.090.08
T3E Performance and Debugging Tools325.781.070.22
SP Applications905.701.180.03
PVP Libraries285.611.37-0.20
PVP Bug Resolution155.601.240.50
SP Bug Resolution785.591.310.14
PVP General Tools and Utilities215.571.25-0.36
SP Performance and Debugging Tools1125.491.280.80
PVP Applications165.441.59-0.39
PVP Performance and Debugging Tools185.331.57-0.73
PDSF Performance and Debugging Tools285.251.65 

Satisfaction with Software (sorted by Platform):

Software Category No. of ResponsesAverage Score  Std. Dev.Change from 2001
SP Fortran Compilers1416.361.100.40
SP User Environment1656.121.130.05
SP C/C++ Compilers766.111.090.39
SP Libraries1196.091.030.09
SP General Tools and Utilities1135.801.090.08
SP Applications905.701.180.03
SP Bug Resolution785.591.310.14
SP Performance and Debugging Tools1125.491.280.80
PDSF C/C++ Compilers356.460.70 
PDSF Fortran Compilers226.450.74 
PDSF User Environment396.380.78 
PDSF Libraries296.240.95 
PDSF Applications296.210.98 
PDSF General Tools and Utilities286.041.04 
PDSF Bug Resolution246.001.14 
PDSF Performance and Debugging Tools285.251.65 
T3E Fortran Compilers496.450.840.05
T3E User Environment546.240.870.06
T3E Libraries396.130.92-0.05
T3E C/C++ Compilers256.041.100.11
T3E General Tools and Utilities355.970.860.32
T3E Bug Resolution265.851.080.15
T3E Applications315.841.040.06
T3E Performance and Debugging Tools325.781.070.22
PVP Fortran Compilers346.470.71-0.19
PVP User Environment346.150.78-0.10
PVP C/C++ Compilers145.931.21-0.07
PVP Libraries285.611.37-0.20
PVP Bug Resolution155.601.240.50
PVP General Tools and Utilities215.571.25-0.36
PVP Applications165.441.59-0.39
PVP Performance and Debugging Tools185.331.57-0.73


Comments about Software:   26 responses

9   Debuggers / performance analysis and other tools
9   Unix environment (shells, editors, GNU, modules)
6   Compilers
6   Applications (math, viz, chemistry)
3   Satisfied
1   Libraries


8. Training


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Somewhat Satisfied4.5 - 5.4
ImportanceAverage Score
Very Important2.5 - 3
Somewhat Important1.5 - 2.4
Significance of Change
significant increase
not significant

Satisfaction with Training:

Training Resource  No. of Responses Average Score Std. Dev. Change from 2001
New User's Guide1386.210.950.27
NERSC Online Tutorials1085.971.060.00
NERSC Training Web Pages995.891.15 
Slides from classes605.331.350.18
NERSC Training Classes405.121.45-0.42

How Useful are these resources for training in HPC?

Training Resource  No. of Responses  Average Score  Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Online Tutorials602.520.68-0.03
Slides from classes452.130.790.03
Classes412.000.89-0.07

What training methods would you like NERSC to offer?   161 responses

Training Method No. of Responses Percentage
General online web documentation 144 89
Online web tutorials on specific topics 126 78
Live DOE Access Grid Classes 21 13
Live web broadcasts with teleconference audio 19 12
Live in-person classes at your site 19 12
Live in-person classes at LBNL 17 11

Comments about training:   22 responses

The training topics users requesteded most frequently are optimization, debugging, performance analysis, and parallel programming.

11   Suggested topics
4   Didn't use / didn't know about training offerings
4   Use online documentation for training
2   New user concerns
2   Problems with training offerings


9. User Services


Legend:

SatisfactionAverage Score
Very Satisfied6.5 - 7
Mostly Satisfied5.5 - 6.4
Significance of Change
not significant

Satisfaction with User Services:

Topic   No. of ResponsesAverage Score  Std. Dev.Change from 2001
Timely response2076.510.89-0.05
Technical advice2056.470.850.01
Time to solve problems1986.400.95 
Response to special requests1366.401.030.17
Followup to initial questions1886.390.970.02
RightNowWeb interface1095.941.14 


Comments about Consulting and Account Support:   21 responses

14   Good service
5   Mosty happy, mixed evaluation
2   Unhappy


10. Comments about NERSC


What does NERSC do well?   92 responses

49   User support, good staff
42   Well run center, good hardware (specific systems not specified)
16   Documentation
13   Job scheduling / batch throughput
10   Seaborg
8   HPSS / data storage
7   PDSF
7   Software / user environment
2   Training

What should NERSC do differently?   66 responses

10   Job Scheduling
7   Allocations / accounting
7   Software
7   Documentation
7   Provide more computing resources
6   Provide better hardware
5   Keep the PVP Cluster / maintain a PVP resource
5   Training / new user services
4   No need for change / no suggestions
3   PDSF
3   More outreach / collaborations
2   More interactive services
2   Networking
1   HPSS
1   No inode quotas

How does NERSC compare to other centers you have used?   62 responses

36   NERSC is the best / very good / overall NERSC is better
11   NERSC is the same as / mixed response
8   No comparison made
7   NERSC is less good

LBNL Home
Page last modified: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:24:57 GMT
Page URL: http://www.nersc.gov/news/survey/2002/allsum.php
Web contact: webmaster@nersc.gov
Computing questions: consult@nersc.gov

Privacy and Security Notice
DOE Office of Science