|
|||||||
Science Highlights: Biological and Environmental Research |
Three-Dimensional Global Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling | |||||||
|
We have developed a global tropospheric chemical model that is capable of treating the chemistry of CO, CH4, NOx, and a suite of VOCs. The model is computationally fast, while providing much better chemical resolution than is available in other tropospheric chemistry models, and is configured so that it may also be run interactively with a climate model. In order to study
the sources of CO and CH4 in the model, we have simplified
the chemistry of the troposphere to mainly focus on the interactions between
OH, CH4, and CO. Ambient distributions of 17 species were calculated
for a prescribed methane and CO distribution using the 3D chemistry-transport
model GRANTOUR. Meteorology was provided for a 4.5° × 7.5° resolution
every 12 hours over a yearly cycle. This simulation was used to diagnose
reaction rate coefficients as a function of latitude, longitude, height,
and time.
Accomplishments
Comparison of the predicted CO and CH4 concentrations with data from the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory indicated that our initial sources result in an underestimate of CO concentrations. Therefore, we adjusted the fossil fuel sources up by a factor of 1.7. The new sources result in a much improved comparison of predicted and observed CO concentrations. We are continuing to use the model to help refine our understanding of CO sources. In addition, we are building a version of the model with interactive isoprene chemistry. This will allow us to determine the additional effects of non-methane hydrocarbon chemistry on the concentration of OH.
Our model represents a significant advance over previous models for tropospheric chemistry because it includes a full suite of VOCs with explicit chemistry represented in the model. These simulations should improve our estimates of the effects of fossil fuel and biomass burning on the global climate by better quantifying the source magnitude and distribution of both biomass and fossil fuel burning. A better definition of the source strength of CO from fossil fuels and from biomass burning will also help us to quantify the sources of aerosols (sulfates and smoke). In contrast to the greenhouse gases, aerosols tend to cool the climate. Thus, the quantification of these sources is extremely important.
J. E. Penner, D. Bergmann, J. J. Walton, D. Kinnison, M. J. Prather, D. Rotman, C. Price, K. E. Pickering, and S. L. Baughcum, "An evaluation of upper tropospheric NOx with two models," J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 103, 97 (1998). U. Lohmann, J. Feichter, J. E. Penner, and R. Leaitch, "Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment," J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. (submitted). |
||||||||
|
||||||||